Homo Economicus and Zoon Politikon: Behavioral Game Theory and Political Behavior

نویسندگان

  • Samuel Bowles
  • Herbert Gintis
چکیده

The rational choice model pioneered by economists is rapidly becoming the standard approach throughout the behavioral sciences. The model is attractive as it allows the mathematical formalization of an essential truth, namely that when people act, they are generally trying to accomplish something, and their efforts are more or less effectively oriented to this end. However, its acceptance in other disciplines coincides with an increasing recognition in economics of the limitations of the behavioral assumptions sometimes summarized by the term Homo economicus. While Homo economicus is not entailed by any of the axioms of the rational choice model, in both teaching and research three assumptions embracing this behavioral model are commonly treated as integral to the approach. First, preferences are assumed to be outcome-regarding; i.e., agents care about only the quantity and quality of goods and services that they possess and consume, not about the social process through which their economic opportunities are determined. In fact, preferences are also in part process-regarding; agents care about how they treat and are treated by others. In evaluating states, people care how those states come to be available. In particular, people care about fairness and reciprocity. Second, preferences are assumed to be self-regarding: agent are assumed to care only about states experienced by themselves, not by others. In fact, however, preferences are in part other-regarding; agents care about the well-being of others, both positively and negatively. In particular, people reward and punish the behavior of others even at a net cost to themselves. ∗Affiliations: Bowles, University of Siena and Santa Fe Institute; Gintis, Santa Fe Institute and Central European University, Budapest. We would like to thank Robert Goodin, Charles Tilly, and Elisabeth Wood for comments, as well as the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and the Behavioral Sciences Program of the Santa Fe Institute for financial support.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Not for citation without authors permission REVISIONIST PUBLIC CHOICE THEORY*

Introduction In a recent essay Christiano (2004) coined a distinction between 'mainstream' and 'revisionist' rational choice political theory, and cast us in the role of revisionist theorists 1. While we disagree with some aspects of Christiano's argument 2 , we broadly accept our designated role as revisionist public choice theorists. The major purposes of this brief paper are to provide a sum...

متن کامل

A new mentality for a new economy: performing the homo economicus in Argentina (1976 83)

This article examines the construction of the homo economicus in Argentina in the context of the last military dictatorship (1976 83). While the worldviews of the military and neo-liberal economists of the time were very different, their common concern for distortions in economic and political life made them translatable. These economists provided a new economic identity that would be in tune w...

متن کامل

The Rapid Evolution of Homo Economicus: Brief Exposure to Neoclassical Assumptions Increases Self-Interested Behavior

The Rapid Evolution of Homo Economicus: Brief Exposure to Neoclassical Assumptions Increases Self-Interested Behavior Economics students have been shown to exhibit more selfishness than other students. Because the literature identifies the impact of long-term exposure to economics instruction (e.g., taking a course), it cannot isolate the specific course content responsible; nor can selection, ...

متن کامل

Beyond Homo Economicus : New Developments in Theories of Social Norms

For more than a century, Homo economicus has exclusively populated the theoretical world of economics. This model of the rationally selfinterested actor has also come to dominate substantial subfields of political science, sociology, law, and philosophy. However, many theorists doubt whether this model can explain most social phenomena unless it is supplemented with more socially sophisticated ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2004